[Freedombox-discuss] (no longer about) Which domain name for the promotionnal website ?

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Wed Sep 28 00:42:40 UTC 2011


On 11-09-28 at 02:11am, Timur Mehrvarz wrote:
> On 28.09.2011 00:05, Weaver wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 23:41:58 +0200
> > Marc Manthey <marc at let.de> wrote:
> > 
> > <snip>
> > 
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How about YvesFreedomBox.org?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or, if you do not intend to govern that new domain as a new
> >>>>> project, freedombox.debian.net or freedombox.debian.org.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ...or work with the foundation on improving/redesigning their
> >>>>> existing website.
> >>>>
> >>>> And i would improve your speaking skills
> >>>>
> >>>> http://media.biks.dk/fb/epfsug/
> >>>
> >>> Great - help with that is much appreciated.
> >>>
> >>> Maybe point me to some particularly elegant highlights from video
> >>> recorded talks you've given yourself.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the constructive criticism,
> >>
> >> See jonas everybody does what he can and is willing todo, but debian  
> >> isnt a religion its a do-o-crathy  ? or how do you call it ?
> >> You are a great package guy from what i heard, but this does not
> >> gives you any rights to argue with someone who is willing todo
> >> something that nobody else did in the past 6 month. So relax and
> >> imagine it were you, that had a great idea and someone just ranted
> >> something that you dont want to hear.
> > 
> > I don't really think there's a need for any of this.
> > I fail to see where anything Jonas has said is anti-productive.
> 
> The way Jonas bullies people, particularly newbies, IS anti-productive.
> These people may become valuable contributers. But scare them away and
> you will never know.
> I would like to see what Yves is able to accomplish.

I would too.

How is it counter-productive to suggest use a Debian sub-domain?

How is it counter-productive to suggest improve Foundation website 
instead of forking yet again?

Admitted, I initially threw a joke by suggesting a more personally 
oriented domain, but that was hinting at the style of conversation on 
that topic: Yves referred to the previous discussion as if there was 
some support here on the list for moving forward with the idea on 
creating yet another environment - but it seems to me the reactions on 
that very thread was mostly the opposite.  The opposite not being "you 
are wrong, don't contribute, go away", but rather "how about using 
existing resources?".


I honestly meant to signal the same: How about using existing resources?


Feel fre to shoot me down as counter productive.  Over and out!


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110928/3d57bf9f/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Freedombox-discuss mailing list