[Freedombox-discuss] [p2p-hackers] Who's interested in project management & collaboration tools? And...

Michael Rogers michael at briarproject.org
Sun Aug 5 12:38:51 UTC 2012


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/08/12 05:24, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> In some sense, the model sitting in the back of my mind, is: - NNTP
> (with encryption and crypto-based access controls) - easier
> management of (private) group creation - messages containing HTML &
> JavaScript that can do some embedded threading (think about sending
> a Wiki page, the initial page shows up as a news message, edits are
> automatically applied rather than showing up as separate messages)

Hi Miles,

I'm working on a project that's trying to achieve the first two of
those three goals (http://briar.sf.net). I'd be interested in
collaborating on the third goal.

A lot of thought has already gone into asynchronous collaborative
editing - Groove, Wave, Etherpad and distributed version control
systems spring to mind. Groove in particular was designed for a P2P
setting, and the protocols are well documented:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc313128%28v=office.12%29.aspx

Perhaps we could start by identifying the subset of Groove's
functionality that would be needed for an Etherpad-like use case?

Cheers,
Michael

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHmlSAAoJEBEET9GfxSfMZKQH/2GJ9j4MUNbTwQ+FxLc78SOJ
f0HcsN7teLI2Ik5pF/ywVGvi32hqEoo9RxvdlM8PWF/3o1J4SujpaOtqy7/va5+3
oe1juzqYCiLaqr1jGDbiyzM7OHGbwfpn+JJNnG5rc0nd63EkY/uEZA7eRDkCw1hu
lQYpT7jUc6cfHhRZBwZsJN7sB/C/u5Sf7eWP9sIaVqjNidgkxhcrE+S/F5fdkpD2
gM2Og/r5VKtj9dmUfzWTrxPSZx/h/4o3oEfpDbcLY8eGZXGzZVpzuCOg38ehM2Jd
4Sx7hXUfOIgLwdJoolS2a15GQpNQHnZq9R794XUBSgwvE5GjOGiD1GnMXzjarV8=
=9tMB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Freedombox-discuss mailing list