[Freedombox-discuss] Rebasing FreedomBuddy?

[cgw993 at aol.com]

Is the Freedom Box almost done?

-----Original Message-----
From: Freedombox-discuss
[mailto:freedombox-discuss-bounces+cgw993=aol.com at lists.alioth.debian.org]
On Behalf Of Alexander Berntsen
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 11:59 PM
To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Rebasing FreedomBuddy?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 11/09/13 03:24, Nick Daly wrote:
> Are there any other (better) options than the (rather nuclear) public 
> rebase?
Revert it. State in the revert commit why you reverted ("somebody fucked
up"). Don't rewrite history -- *ever* -- on a public repository. That takes
precedence to almost all other rules. The only acceptable reason to do it is
because of legal trouble or similar.

Of course this is all just my opinion, but I think you'll find that
rewriting history on public repositories is generally more than frowned
upon.
- --
Alexander
alexander at plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlIwFLgACgkQRtClrXBQc7W+9AD/XTSFdYMY7a2JuOCd0es7qGMg
m4swm3nGXaVnFZcb9DwBAKdHw9RRo7dGp2Hwv976K7xZDc3U1BDtP6lGYRGHk7P0
=t3SJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Freedombox-discuss mailing list
Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss