[Freedombox-discuss] Domains in Let's encrypt

[Dietmar]

Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2016, 19:32 +0200 schrieb Dietmar:

> Am Dienstag, den 03.05.2016, 19:29 +0200 schrieb Dietmar:
> 
> > Am Montag, den 02.05.2016, 23:17 +0200 schrieb Saúl Ibarra
> > Corretgé: 
> > 
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > On 05/02/2016 08:10 PM, Dietmar wrote:
> > > > With this, and some mails that will follow, I am surely qualifying as
> > > > the stupid user this project is eventually designed for ;-).
> > > > 
> > > > First topic is Let's encrypt. It's up and running, but no domains are
> > > > listed in Plinth. (Of course, I did not tell the domain names). So, how
> > > > do I tell Let's encrypt for which domains it shall generate the certificate?
> > > > My current home-page (see below) still has the certificate signed for
> > > > local only.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Go to the system configuration (the wheel icon at the top right) and
> > > there to Configure. Once you enter the Domain Name it will show up as a
> > > candidate in the letsencrypt section.
> > > 
> > > > PS: On one hand, I want to make use of the box as much as possible, on
> > > > the other, I want to support the project with my questions to have it
> > > > eventually as "idiot proof" as possible, and I fear I am good at that ;- )
> > > 
> > > :-)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > 
> > Oh my god, I even translated this bit and did not think of it :-(. I
> > just did not make the connection.
> > Thanks Saul, James.
> > As far as I understand, the domain is now a candidate for
> > letsencrypt. When should I check again if the key was generated?
> > 
> 
> Oh again, already done. I will put it briefly in the wiki.

Giving it another thought about the wiki (and actually the structure of
features in Plinth). 
I am collecting some of my learnings on my homepage. Part of it is
copied to the wiki as well, but I just like thinks my way - sometimes.
So in this collection I created a chapter "external access" in which I
describe DynDNS, PageKite and Let's Encrypt. It's in German, but maybe
it can be understood nevertheless:
https://divmondes.sds-ip.de/ikiwiki/iizathome/vernetzt/ExternerZugriff/ 
My suggestion is to use a similar approach for the manual and also the
Plinth interface. So to list features by functionality for user, rather
than by package. What's the general opinion? I would work it out in more
detail next week if it's of interest.

> >     Dietmar 
> > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> > > Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20160503/d19ef557/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: face-sad.png
Type: image/png
Size: 1057 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20160503/d19ef557/attachment-0001.png>