<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>
Hash: SHA1<br>
<br>
On 07/14/2011 03:28 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">> On 11-07-14 at 08:43am, James
Vasile wrote:<br>
>> There are two questions here. First, what working
groups should we <br>
>> form. Second, how shall those groups operate? I think
if we answer <br>
>> the first, each group can answer the second on its own.
I'm happy to <br>
>> arrange hosted infrastructure to the extent debian.org
or github don't <br>
>> suit.</span><br>
I think that the working groups suggested by Sébastien make quite
a<br>
bit of sense, with the addition of a group for thinking about<br>
connectivity. I've labelled according to where I see these falling
in<br>
the OSI stack, but I think that's of less importance - there is
sure<br>
to be spillover from layer to layer.<br>
<br>
So then, the five groups could be:<br>
0) Connectivity (Physical/Link/Network Layer)<br>
1) Privacy (Transport/Session/Presentation Layer)<br>
2) Data Ownership (Application)<br>
3) Social (Application)<br>
4) UI/UX<br>
<br>
How much separation do people see between the data ownership and<br>
social bits of the box? I see them both working mostly in the<br>
application layer, and I wonder if we should be trying to engage
in<br>
integrative thinking there.<br>
<br>
We might also consider a designated security group.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, does this breakdown seem reasonable to others?<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
> Makes sense to leave it to each group how they operate. But
please <br>
> think twice before choosing
cool-but-commercially-controlled tools at <br>
> github or Google or Ubuntu or wherever: It might be fine
initially with <br>
> everyone in the group, but may discourage later
contributions to that <br>
> group from some of the careful/paranoid among us (myself
included).<br>
></span><br>
+1<br>
Very much agreed.<br>
I also much agree that an instance of etherpad would be quite
useful.<br>
<br>
<br>
take care,<br>
imw<br>
<span style="white-space: pre;">><br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list<br>
> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org">Freedombox-discuss@lists.alioth.debian.org</a><br>
>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss</a></span><br>
<br>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)<br>
<br>
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOH018AAoJEA8fUKCD77NLio8H/j5qDpUZL3aqb1DGYROYmUch<br>
q2n1o1Pf84rMQUBU0GQMCqUIVoxct/koI6QKcql7Loafy/qndBhRaC5urHWcFiq7<br>
PVNyajhJgAc9p9YuUmcsdtQ0F1BXHfp+Kf76jHD1UiTt+N5XpR+0HxtaoJ6re3mt<br>
eRVbIkwA8XIQIvGzR43l1AdgrSwNMckl1zm9EOSz/tgwA/V6X2njDmcmMNAfPRIH<br>
eRt2v8aLM4PinkCQ6skdIpgPv9xG1x7zUD/yBJyDbLL6vzZxNC7zUsAi0wnStu52<br>
JM8BD60pHSlv7sPmZ8JJsT5qso51dBZVTspBlXgoGaDikPDqjBiUgjvkB+rk6dg=<br>
=eEiq<br>
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>