<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 07/16/2011 06:32 PM, nathan nolast wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+9LqF62p4QrukjBpOe8cVYoF24An3Fka6iXHUMopqiSw=1EfA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite"><br>
I think some points we are missing ...<br>
<br>
There is a search engine out that is offering some privacy
advantages <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.ddg.gg/"
target="_blank">http://www.ddg.gg</a> or <a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://duckduckgo.com/"
target="_blank">duckduckgo.com</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Not missing this, because a lot of us are using it (when I'm not
using google). Assuming you trust duckduckgo (whereas you do not
trust Google and Yahoo), it still cannot help you with oligopolist
filtering, though, as it's a meta search engine, not a "real" one.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CA+9LqF62p4QrukjBpOe8cVYoF24An3Fka6iXHUMopqiSw=1EfA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
Plausible solution, i'll skip the debate because ive seen this
discussion a few times. <br>
<br>
TLD's for users to use that are not indexed. like a mysite.pvy
(insert any fashionalbe TLD ..)<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This is a different issue. Distributed DNS alternatives have their
own threadS ;-) It doesn't help you find mysite.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>