<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=iso-8859-1"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><br><div><div>On 1 Nov 2012, at 14:45, Melvin Carvalho <<a href="mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com">melvincarvalho@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><br>Just touching base on this. We just spent 3 very productive days at TPAC with, among others, timbl and alex bertalis, who reliably informs us that he coined the term "WebBox".<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br>I was wondering your thoughts about working with the guidelines of the upcoming REC track, Linked Data Platform [1], which is being developed by Alex and others.<br>
<br>I think in the case of freedombox it would be desireable to have not only a web identity but to tie it to GPG, which is something I've already done some work on. <br><br>Would love to know your thoughts.<br><br>[1] <a href="http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter.html">http://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/charter.html</a><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><div>I had a look at your link, but I have hardly any W3C experience, so I'm struggling to understand what you'd like my thoughts on.</div><div><br></div><div>In terms of working within its scope, it's difficult to say. I'm leaning heavily towards working with a single form of JSON-LD (specifically the "expanded" form), and putting all of my effort towards that, rather than turtle or xml/rdf etc. Similarly, we're finding sticking to REST is really constraining.</div><div><br></div><div>The charter does mention JSON-LD, so hopefully they'll make something that developers who like JSON will understand and want to use.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Dan</div><div><br></div></body></html>