gnuab archive consistency, bugs in BTS

[Petr Salinger]

> > There are many unsubmitted patches, 
> > unreleased contains 449 source packages with following suffixes:
> > 
> > 100 +cfg 
> > 120 +libtool
> > 203 +kbsd
> > 
> > In BTS, there are listed at about 225 unfixed packages, see
> > 
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=kfreebsd;users=glibc-bsd-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org;pri0=pending:pending,forwarded,pending-fixed,fixed,done,absent;ttl0=Outstanding,Forwarded,Pending%20Upload,Fixed%20in%20NMU,Resolved;pri1=pending%3dpending%2btag%3dwontfix,pending%3dpending%2btag%3dmoreinfo,pending%3dpending%2btag%3dpatch,pending%3dpending%2btag%3dconfirmed,pending%3dpending;ttl1=Will%20Not%20Fix,More%20information%20needed,Patch%20Available,Confirmed,Unclassified;ord1=2,3,4,1,0,5
> > 
> > According to bug titles, suffixes would be
> >  40 +cfg
> >  35 +libtool
> > 150 +kbsd 
> 
> > My intent is to submit them in a batch for following source packages:
> > have the +cfg/+libtool in unreleased, not listed in our unstable (i.e. above 37 packages), no bug report tagged kfreebsd
> > Text would be based on http://glibc-bsd.alioth.debian.org/porting/  
> > reportbug_cfg and reportbug_libtool.
> 
> I think you can do that for +cfg packages. 

For +cfg packages done, kfreebsd tag added.

For future one more condition - source package exists in current unstable and it is not arch all
(at least tuxracer and xlispstat are no longer in official unstable).

Petr