[Gnuk-users] Gnuk and possible hardware vulnerability
NIIBE Yutaka
gniibe at fsij.org
Wed Aug 23 23:49:30 UTC 2017
Aurelien Jarno <aurelien at aurel32.net> wrote:
> It seems that the protection has been improved on the STM32 F1 series.
IIRC, STM32F1 is older than STM32F0. I'm sure the design of Cortex-M3
is older than Cortex-M0.
I checked the timeline [0]. Yes, STM32F1 is the oldest implementation
by STMicroelectronics.
> All that said the article suggests to check the RDP value at the
> beginning of the boot and set enable the memory protection if it is not
> done.
I don't know if this makes sense. When incorrect RDP value is detected,
the content of flash ROM might be already taken *before* that check,
being connected SWD debugger.
Well, it's good if user can see the status of the protection.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STM32#History
--
More information about the gnuk-users
mailing list