<html><head></head><body>I also concur about your thoughts on Gopher+. I'd personally like to develop a more modern extension that would both be easier to implement on server and client side.<br>
<br>
Yes, perhaps having a separate thread for TLS would be good.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On April 23, 2015 9:47:00 AM MDT, simple@sdf.org wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">James Mills <prologic@shortcircuit.net.au> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Cameron Kaiser <spectre@floodgap.com><br /> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #ad7fa8; padding-left: 1ex;"> I'm not opposed to Gopher over TLS, but I definitely would not want it to<br /> be<br /> mandatory, and it would increase client burden as well particularly with<br /> respect to certificate management.</blockquote><br /><br /> +1 on Gopher over TLS being optional.<br /></blockquote><br />I'm also in support of optional TLS. As for gopher+ I think it's the<br />proverbial kicked dead equine. BTW, why are we discussing TLS in a<br />"gopher+" thread? They aren't really related - better to give TLS its<br />own thread, no?<br /><br />Jeff / gopher://<a
href="http://jgw.mdns.org">jgw.mdns.org</a><br /><br /><hr /><br />Gopher-Project mailing list<br />Gopher-Project@lists.alioth.debian.org<br /><a href="http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project">http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gopher-project</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>