[hardening-discuss] Bug#836162: diversions for linkers need an update

Moritz Mühlenhoff jmm at inutil.org
Thu Sep 15 19:33:19 UTC 2016


On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 09:10:04PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-09-15 08:14 +0200, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:03:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 05:17:06PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> > I think we should remove hardening-wrapper for the stretch release? dpkg-buildflags/dh
> >> > are around for a long time now and we're down to about 50 reverse dependencies at
> >> > this point. Plus, lintian marks it as deprecated for quite a while now.
> >> > 
> >> > Kees, what do you think?
> >> 
> >> Yeah, it (and hardening-includes) should get removed in favor of
> >> the dpkg-buildflags method.  However, this means we need to move the
> >> "hardening-check" script from hardening-includes to lintian, probably.
> >
> > Ack. devscripts might be more appropriate, though.
> 
> That would make lintian depend on devscripts.  I suppose this is not
> really desirable, is it?

True, I was more thinking from the perspective of the "maintainer wants to check
her package for hardened build flags" use case.

Cheers,
        Moritz



More information about the hardening-discuss mailing list