debian and gentoo branches [to be removed]

[Farzad Sehat]

I agree with the Xavier, for the moment the compiler and editor should be
enough for packages and after when we have stable
libraries like the opengl one we can think about other packages.
We could have one packages with the content of the compiler.git and several
packages on for each editor mode.

M. Farzad Sehat
farzad.sehat at gmail.com


2009/11/14 Xavier Oswald <xoswald at gmail.com>

> On 11:10 Sat 14 Nov     , PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > > Well,
> >
> > > The fact is that we have a gentoo and debian branch since we have tools
> in the
> > > debian and gentoo project that understand the git structure and will
> then use
> > > the right branch.
> >
> > > Before removing/moving anything we have to take a decision with
> Frederic about
> > > how we will work with debian.
> >
> > > For gentoo, I think we can remove it since it's only one small file.
> >
> > > So Frederic, what I suggest is keeping the debian branch and add a
> debian branch
> > > in the new editors.git and libraries.git so we will be able to build
> packages
> > > respectively for:
> > >  * The compiler:
> > >    - lisaac
> > >    - lisaac-common
> > >    - lisaac-doc (shorter)
> > >  * Editors:
> > >    - lisaac-vim-mode
> > >    - lisaac-kate-mode
> > >    - lisaac-emacs-mode
> > >    - lisaac-EDITOR-mode ...
> > >  * Libraries:
> > >    - libbase-lisaac
> > >    - libopengl-lisaac
> > >    - libLIBRARY-lisaac ...
> >
> > Ok so what you are discribing are the debian pakages names.
> > Maybe the best things to do is to have independant repository for the
> > packaging. No interaction with the upstreazm developpement.
> > No risk to make a mistake on the central repository.
> >
> > So what I propose is
> >
> > pkg-lisaac.git repository
> > pkg-lisaac-editors.git repository
> > pkg-lisaac-libs.git repository
> >
> > the alioth way :)
> >
> > then we importe directly on the standard git-buildpackage branch
> hierarchy
> > the official .tar.gz for each tree upstream repository.
> >
> > lets call them:
> > lisaac.tar.gz
> > lisaac-editors.tar.gz
> > lisaac-libs.tar.gz
> >
> > what do you think about this.
>
> When we do a release, in the lisaac-X.tar.gz, you will have, compiler,
> documentation, editors support, external libraries (opengl etc..)
>
> I think keeping a debian branch in each git we want things to debian is
> easier
> and more flexible. I suggest a the beginning to have one in compiler.git
> and
> editors.git.
>
> Then we can release libraries independantly when a library is ready
> (opengl,
> sqlite, etc...).
>
> The fact is that the final lisaac-X.tar.gz tarball contains to much things
> and
> it's quite big to each time upload it to debian (about 15M) due to PDF
> ducumentation etc..
>
> Greetings,
> --
>  ,''`.| ====== Xavier Oswald  ====== | mail: xoswald at debian.org         |
> : :' :| Engineer at CALDERA GRAPHICS | http://www.caldera.eu            |
> `. `' | GNU/LINUX Debian Developer   | http://debian.org                |
>  `-  | Isaac Project Developer      | http://isaacproject.u-strasbg.fr |
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091114/1e54eea1/attachment.htm>