Idea about deferred slots

[Mildred Ki'Lya]

On 10/15/2009 02:30 PM, Damien Bouvarel wrote:
> If you want more deferred detection (like java interfaces), a proto
> could define the slots that need redefining:
Well, that's exactly the use of `deferred'.
Ultimately, all deferred slots should be redefined, and if they are not,
this is an error.

> A section Interface (or whatever), all the slots there are implicitely
> deferred,
> if your proto inherits directly (work with all types of inheritance?)
> a proto who has slots in these sections, you must redefine all these
> slots (you also can implements them with deferred slot or create
> another section Interface for children protos)
Sections are for protection level mostly (Section Public, Private,
TYPE). I don't think that would be wise to add a new section just to
declare deferred slots. Writing
    <- deferred;
is good enough for me.

Mildred

-- 
Mildred Ki'Lya
╭───────── ｍｉｌｄｒｅｄ５９３＠ｏｎｌｉｎｅ．ｆｒ ──────────
│ Jabber, GoogleTalk: <mildred at jabber.fr>
│ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>           GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B
│ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/lisaac-devel/attachments/20091015/9ab8b9c9/attachment.pgp>