Idea about deferred slots

[Nicolas Boulay]

Should -all-warnings be the default ? Or there is too much false alarm
? Calling Lisaac without -boost should be oriented to developement and
not performance (of the compiler or the generated code).

Nicolas, back from vacation.

2009/10/15 Mildred Ki'Lya <ml.mildred593 at gmail.com>:
> On 10/14/2009 02:52 PM, Xavier Oswald wrote:
>> You can easily semulate interface but putting all slot of a prototype defered.
>>
> Sure, but P-A was saying that if you do that the compiler won't check
> that ALL the slots are implemented.
> That would be nice to have a compile time error instead of a runtime error.
>
> Well, I think -all-warnings shows the deferred slots, so that's not that
> much a problem.
>
> --
> Mildred Ki'Lya
> ╭───────── ｍｉｌｄｒｅｄ５９３＠ｏｎｌｉｎｅ．ｆｒ ──────────
> │ Jabber, GoogleTalk: <mildred at jabber.fr>
> │ Website: <http://ki.lya.online.fr>           GPG ID: 9A7D 2E2B
> │ Fingerprint: 197C A7E6 645B 4299 6D37 684B 6F9D A8D6 9A7D 2E2B
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lisaac-devel mailing list
> Lisaac-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/lisaac-devel
>
>