[Logcheck-devel] postfix rules

[martin f krafft]

also sprach martin f krafft <madduck at debian.org> [2006.10.06.1639 +0200]:
> The postfix rules of logcheck are a total mess and I would like to
> redo them from scratch for etch. Given that etch will have postfix
> 2.3 and only 2.3, is there any reason why I would need to keep the
> 2.1 and 2.2 rules around?

I supposed the same question applies to other programmes, like
dovecot...

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"driving with a destination
 is like having sex to have children"
                                             -- backwater wayne miller
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20061006/8f8962be/attachment.pgp