[Ltrace-devel] status of new tree?

[Joe Damato]

All,

I've created a tag in my git repository called 0.6.0 which I hope will
be the next release. I've rebased/squashed to get rid of some
bugfix/merge commits so I think the git history is much cleaner now.

You will need to git pull -f and possibly a git reset --hard
origin/[BRANCH] since I rewrote some of the git history in github
repository.

If I don't hear any disagreement in the next few days, I'll pull my
changes into Juan's official git repository and then nudge him to
upload a new .deb.

Anything else I'm forgetting to do before declaring a release?

Joe

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Joe Damato <ice799 at gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I have two patchsets out for review. One attempted fix for libunwind
> support on non-x86 architectures, and one larger one for lib-dl
> support. AFAIK, these are the only outstanding patches remaining
> before an ltrace release.
>
> Once these two sets are merged in, we can test ltrace, and assuming
> everything is OK we'll be ready to release.
>
> Almost there,
> joe
>
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Joe Damato <ice799 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I've pushed several commits to my master on github. You can check them
>> out here: http://github.com/ice799/ltrace/commits/master
>>
>> I've merged a bunch of my patches (including libunwind support),
>> autotools support, and the first set of Fedora patches. If you have
>> access to non-x86 hardware, please pull my tree and try libunwind
>> support. I've only tested on x86's, but it _seems_ to work.
>>
>> What's left:
>> - The only patch of mine left is the patch which adds libdl support.
>> This patch will need some work and will probably take me at least a
>> few days to refactor and correct so that the tests all pass.
>> - A few more Fedora patches need to be merged. I'd love help code
>> reviewing these. Zach (or anyone else) if you have time to take a look
>> the commits are found here:
>> http://github.com/pmachata/ltrace/commits/ppc and in the meantime I'll
>> spend my time correcting my patchset.
>>
>> Aside from those two patchsets, I believe everything from the past
>> year has been merged into master. Please let me know if I am missing
>> anything.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience --
>> joe
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Joe Damato <ice799 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Zach -
>>>
>>> My libdl changes need to be refactored a bit as they break some of the
>>> tests and probably don't work on other architectures. I'm traveling
>>> right now, but I hope to refactor my changes and push them to the
>>> master branch once I return home and readjust my sleep schedule :) I'd
>>> love to have this refactored end of october/early november time
>>> permitting.
>>>
>>> All the patches posted to the list have been merged in except mine and
>>> the fedora changes that I just got a pull request for. I'll try to get
>>> the fedora changes in and then finish up refactoring my code.
>>>
>>> joe
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Zach Welch <zwelch at codesourcery.com> wrote:
>>>> Joe,
>>>>
>>>> I was wonder when you might have a chance to finish incorporating all of
>>>> the past years' patches into one branch. Upon pulling your GitHub tree,
>>>> I see that you have done some work, but I am eager to see all of the
>>>> changes available for testing. I also want to see them pushed into the
>>>> master tree soon, and I have some available time to devote to helping
>>>> out with this process. What are your plans?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Zach Welch
>>>> CodeSourcery
>>>> zwelch at codesourcery.com
>>>> (650) 331-3385 x743
>>>>
>>>
>>
>