[Ltrace-devel] new ARM failures

Petr Machata pmachata at redhat.com
Tue Dec 7 14:19:41 UTC 2010


07.12.2010 14:07, Petr Machata wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, those above are not really regressions. They are
> new tests for things that never worked. If the goal is to put out a
> release that passes its own test suite, then all that's needed is to
> comment out the right lines in parameters.exp. But I'd rather keep the
> code itself in tree.

FWIW, I'm _for_ putting out a release that can pass its own testsuite.

>> can be deferred until a later release, but I would be happier to see
>> these fixed properly.
>
> FWIW, the fixes for passing double on 32-bit machines is here:
> https://github.com/pmachata/ltrace/tree/pmachata
> This branch may need re-seating after recent changes to tree history.
> That should take care of the first failure that you cited.

Except it probably won't.  You'd probably need to implement 
get_argument_rich for arm.

PM



More information about the Ltrace-devel mailing list