[Ltrace-devel] ltrace and libelf

[Petr Machata]

03.11.2010 13:12, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> The downside for this approach is that now everything that is linked is
> linked against libelf, even the convenience libs.
>
> /bin/bash ../../../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -g -O2 -Wall -O2
>    -o ../libcpu.la  plt.lo regs.lo trace.lo  -lelf
>
> But that's just a cosmetic problem, doesn't affect the file size. I've
> tested it with with libelfs on ubuntu. You can add my Tested-by:
>
>> Since there was no answer, my proposal became a pull request.  Included
>> in that pull request is Marc's AS_HELP_STRING patch.
>> https://github.com/ice799/ltrace/pull/3
>
> When doing kernel development it's usual add you S-o-b to the patches
> from other people if you add then to you own branch. How do you handle
> it in ltrace?

I don't think we do.  I can add those tags if you feel strong about 
this.  I don't think that doing forced updates in context of a project 
like ltrace is a terrible problem, so I can update the branch even at 
this point.

PM