[Ltrace-devel] Pulling in patches

Petr Machata pmachata at redhat.com
Fri Oct 8 12:22:15 UTC 2010


08.10.2010 04:03, Zach Welch wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 06:24 PM, Joe Damato wrote:
>> # of expected passes	49
>> # of unexpected failures	30
>>
>> Perhaps it makes sense to fix these before merging the floating
>> patches in so that we prevent breakage? Anyone want to help fix these
>> test suite failures? I'll start working on them, but could definitely
>> use a hand.
>
> Assuming that you're testing on x86, these are all fixed by two patches
> in Arnaud's series (demangle-lib.cpp and count-records.exp). I suggest
> reordering his series to ensure those patches go in first.

Hi,

as soon as that's done, I'll try to run the suite on Fedora (where I 
maintain ltrace). There's a bunch of patches in Fedora, on top of some 
old stable-ish svn checkout.  I'll see into cleaning up and moving into 
git anything that makes sense (or is necessary for ltrace to pass the 
suite).

PM



More information about the Ltrace-devel mailing list