[Ltrace-devel] DWARF test suite

[Petr Machata]

Dima Kogan <lists at dima.secretsauce.net> writes:

>> Though if you want to put the logic that just enables c++ in there like
>> you do in d983fbdf, that makes sense to me as well.  In that case,
>> please update demangle.exp so that it doesn't list the c++ option
>> unnecessarily.  But in any case, please keep the C++11 flags private to
>> your test case.
>
> OK. What you suggest doesn't really work because then everything in my
> tests will be built as c++, instead of just the .cc. I can make us both

Right, I didn't notice you have a .c file as well.

> happy, but let me understand specifically what the complaint is. Are you
> opposed to the full patch to ltrace.exp (build all .cc and .cpp as c++
> source), or just the fact that I'm building them as a gnu++11 flavor of
> c++? If I removed the gnu++11 part from the ltrace.exp patch, and put
> that into dwarf.exp somehow, then we're good?

Yes.

In the new-style tests (e.g. parameters2.exp), we use file ending to
determine what's inside the file.  Would it make sense to have a cc
ending for C++98, c11 for C++11, etc.?

Thanks,
PM