[Ltrace-devel] [PATCH] check return value of unw_get_reg and unw_get_proc_name

Petr Machata pmachata at redhat.com
Mon Jan 6 18:29:46 UTC 2014


Juan Cespedes <cespedes at debian.org> writes:

> However, I would prefer "???" instead of "error" in this message:
>
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:05:03PM -0800, Luca Clementi wrote:
>> +				fprintf(options.output, " > %s(error) [%p]\n",

Yes please.  This way it looks as if "error" were the name of the
function this was resolved to.

Thanks,
PM



More information about the Ltrace-devel mailing list