[Ltrace-devel] [PATCH] check return value of unw_get_reg and unw_get_proc_name
Petr Machata
pmachata at redhat.com
Mon Jan 6 18:29:46 UTC 2014
Juan Cespedes <cespedes at debian.org> writes:
> However, I would prefer "???" instead of "error" in this message:
>
> On Fri, Jan 03, 2014 at 10:05:03PM -0800, Luca Clementi wrote:
>> + fprintf(options.output, " > %s(error) [%p]\n",
Yes please. This way it looks as if "error" were the name of the
function this was resolved to.
Thanks,
PM
More information about the Ltrace-devel
mailing list