xml-rpc?

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Thomas Hood <jdthood at gmail.com> [2007.10.19.1741 +0200]:
> Upstart will maintain its own socket (probably with the same
> name), the only difference is when you connect to it, you talk
> D-BUS rather than talking a custom IPC protocol.

xml-rpc isn't really custom, but I suppose this is something
I should look into. Or anyone else, if you find the time. Thanks,
Thomas.

(PS: waiting anviously until January when I can hack again)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"the worst part of being old is remembering when you was young."
                                -- alvin straight (the straight story)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/attachments/20071022/eb15fa49/attachment.pgp