[Nut-packaging] RPM .spec files in NUT source tree

[Arnaud Quette]

2008/12/18 Oden Eriksson <oeriksson at mandriva.com>:
> Den Thursday 18 December 2008 13:21:05 skrev Arnaud Quette:
>> Hi Oden,
>>
>> 2008/12/18 Oden Eriksson <oeriksson at mandriva.com>:
>> > Den Monday 15 December 2008 09:25:33 skrev Arnaud Quette:
>> >> 2008/12/14 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
>> >> > All,
>> >>
>> >> Hey there,
>> >>
>> >> as a side note, this point is linked to the "make package" target in NUT
>> >> 2.4.0
>> >>
>> >> > Arnaud and I were discussing the *.spec files we have in the NUT
>> >> > source tree, and with the 2.4.0 release of NUT just around the corner,
>> >> > I would like to make sure we are pointing people in the right
>> >> > direction for NUT RPMs.
>> >
>> > I don't care much about that, sorry. Too much other stuff to maintain
>> > (over 1200 src.rpm packages...).
>> >
>> >> @Oden: btw, what's your situation? I heard about rumors, that I hope
>> >> are not true.
>> >
>> > Yep. It's true. I'm open to some nice job offers (productization stuff).
>>
>> uhm, sad :-(
>> If I hear anything interesting, I'll redirect to you (you may have
>> another mail @?)
>
> Please use oden.eriksson at envitory.se for that, thanks. The mandriva email
> address won't stop working unless i tell them to nuke it.
>
>> btw, I've not included you in the other thread, but do you want to
>> stay in the team or do you want to retire?
>
> No it's ok.

ok, thanks for the confirmation.

>> > I've been lazy or rather due to workload with submitting patches. So here
>> > it comes:
>> >
>> > nut-openssl_linkage_fix.diff
>> > http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Underlinking
>>
>> applied (I thought I've already done so though!)
>> that remembers me that we also have some overlinking to address
>> (reported through Debian):
>> http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Overlinking
>>
>> > nut-2.2.2-format_not_a_string_literal_and_no_format_arguments.diff
>> > http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Development/Packaging/Problems#format_not_a_s
>> >tring_literal_and_no_format_arguments
>>
>> Arjen has already started to do something there.
>> @Arjen: can you please counter check the
>> nut-2.2.2-format_not_a_string_literal_and_no_format_arguments.diff
>> patch?

Arjen will take a look at this point, but my latest compilation (a few
seconds ago) seems to confirm that he has already addressed
everything...

no more patches on your side?
cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - MGE Office Protection Systems - http://www.mgeops.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/