[Nut-upsdev] Fwd: RE New xanto driver for NUT

[Andreas Thienemann]

On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:

> Since we now have an example where it doesn't work, it means that we
> can only do "testing" with a limited number of commands (those that
> are supported everywhere but may have variations, like "Q1").
True. One way might be that Q is not supported, but Q1 gives the standard 
answer.

> I'll take a look at it when you submit it. Then we can see what can
> and can't be done.
thx.
 
> That's why I think going ahead with the fork is the better option
> right now. At least the hardware gets supported and all these
> questions can be answered.
agreed.

bye,
 andreas