[Nut-upsdev] about battery.date.*

[Charlie Brady]

On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Arnaud Quette wrote:
> 
> > I think the naming should be changed to propose both:
> > - battery.date.mfr: Battery manufacturing date
> > - battery.date.change: Battery change date
> >
> > Any comments?
> 
> Seems reasonable. Or simply battery.mfr and battery.change to get a 
> common naming. I'd prefer that to renaming the other variables to 
> things like battery.ampere.charge and battery.seconds.runtime ...

"battery.mfr" doesn't imply a date or time to me.

Is the "mfr" contraction necessary?

--
Charlie