[Nut-upsdev] Mixed-commit problem solved

Arnaud Quette aquette.dev at gmail.com
Mon Jan 9 12:06:43 UTC 2012


Hi Charles,

2012/1/8 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>

> On Jan 6, 2012, at 7:34 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > # 4. Is the new_UIs-root tag still useful?  It doesn't seem to point
> > #    at an actual branch.
>
> ESR: In terms of content, no - not useful.
>
> Arnaud: While nothing has been committed on this branch[*], this is a good
> reminder to check your development machines for any working copies with
> uncommitted changes.
>
> [*] http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/log/branches/new_UIs
>

The actual work has been done in the trunk, on NUT Monitor.
This branch goes back before this, and we can now delete it (which I've
done in r3380) since I don't see any added value there.

Note that I have a few things stagging for the "Powerchain" branch, which
is not yet usable, but might be worth to commit.
But since I don't want to interfere with the git transition, this can wait
a bit more...

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20120109/8a8ef5cc/attachment.html>


More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list