<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2005/10/8, Alfred Ganz <<a href="mailto:alfred-ganz+nut@agci.com">alfred-ganz+nut@agci.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
...<br>Question, is there a reason why the PowerSummary.PresentStatus variables<br>Discharging and Charging are not handled in a similar fashion? If not,<br>could this be changed?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>
first, even if your battery is full, and your ups is online, there is a
small amount of power drawn. So having always is CHRG status is normal.<br>
In fact, these complementary status are more interesting for higher end UPSs.<br clear="all"><br>
second, these status need not to be handled like LB, as each one clears the other. While LB had no pending event (!LB) before...<br>
<br>
or did I get you wrong?<br>
<br>
Arnaud<br>-- <br>Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt<br>Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - <a href="http://www.networkupstools.org/">http://www.networkupstools.org/</a><br>Debian Developer - <a href="http://people.debian.org/~aquette/">
http://people.debian.org/~aquette/</a><br>OpenSource Developer - <a href="http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/">http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/</a>