<br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/12 Charles Lepple <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clepple@gmail.com">clepple@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Arjen de Korte <<a href="mailto:nut%2Bdevel@de-korte.org">nut+devel@de-korte.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Citeren Arnaud Quette <<a href="mailto:aquette@alioth.debian.org">aquette@alioth.debian.org</a>>:<br>
><br>
>> Author: aquette<br>
>> Date: Sat Dec 11 12:31:21 2010<br>
>> New Revision: 2731<br>
>> URL: <a href="http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731" target="_blank">http://trac.networkupstools.org/projects/nut/changeset/2731</a><br>
>><br>
>> Log:<br>
>> Complete the list of Subversion ignored files, with AsciiDoc generated<br>
>> contents (no functional changes)<br>
><br>
> Is there a particular reason for having both the man/ and docs/man/ pages in<br>
> the trunk? As far as I can see, the first has been replaced by the second.<br>
<br>
</div>Sorry about that - during the conversion to AsciiDoc, I didn't remove<br>
each man page as it was converted. I missed that during the merge,<br>
too.<br></blockquote></div><br>docs/man/Makefile.am still need some work though, ie a dist-hook to generate manpages and install adaptation, as per man/Makefile.am.<br><br>cheers,<br>Arno<br>