<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Arjen de Korte wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:470D21F7.2040006@de-korte.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Charles Lepple wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr= 20mA
I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=03(HID ) Sub=00 Prot=00 Driver=(none)
E: Ad=81(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 8 Ivl=10ms
E: Ad=02(O) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 8 Ivl=10ms
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">Arjen,
While I agree that usbhid-ups should have printed the strings, the
/proc/bus/usb/devices line says "Driver=(none)".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Yes, and that's weird. We *have* reports that the same VID:PID
combination is working with usbhid-ups. Apparently no driver has claimed
this device, yet it doesn't answer at all (all control messages we send
to it, time out). This doesn't look like a usbhid-ups problem, but
rather the USB (or libusb) implementation on this particular platform.
</pre>
</blockquote>
Hrm. I compiled libusb 0.1.12 from scratch. I will try rebuilding it
with CFLAGS=-O and then recompile nut with CFLAGS=-O as well.
Sometimes, on this machine I have problems compiling programs with -O2
(causes gcc to segfault under some weird circumstances).<br>
<br>
*And* I'll cross my fingers for luck ;)<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Victor Rehorst - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chuma@chuma.org">chuma@chuma.org</a> - <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:victor@newtontalk.net">victor@newtontalk.net</a>
Personal Homepage - <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.chuma.org/">http://www.chuma.org/</a>
</pre>
</body>
</html>