<div class="gmail_quote">2011/2/22 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:roy@karlsbakk.net">roy@karlsbakk.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi all<br></blockquote><div> <br>Hi Roy<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
We're considering getting some Powerware 9355-30-M-0 UPSes to replace some older ones, so I wonder if it would be possible to use NUT for this. It seems 9315 is supported, but AFAICS that's the top model.<br></blockquote>
<div><br>we (Eaton) are currently in the process of formally validating all our current range with NUT.<br></div></div><br>I've not had a chance to locally test a 9355.<br>but I'll have a remote access and assistance to one next monday, in case something needs to be improved.<br>
<br>That being said, bcmxcp and snmp-ups should already handle this unit without (much) problems.<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>Arnaud<br>-- <br>Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - <a href="http://powerquality.eaton.com" target="_blank">http://powerquality.eaton.com</a><br>Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - <a href="http://www.networkupstools.org/" target="_blank">http://www.networkupstools.org/</a><br>
Debian Developer - <a href="http://www.debian.org" target="_blank">http://www.debian.org</a><br>Free Software Developer - <a href="http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/" target="_blank">http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/</a><br><br>