[Openstack-devel] Fwd: keystone REMOVED from testing

[Loic Dachary]

On 05/29/2012 02:36 PM, Ding Deng wrote:
> Loic Dachary <loic at enovance.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This (removal of keystone from testing) is a definitive sign that our
>> team is understaffed :-) At the moment Ghe Rivero and Mehdi Abaakouk
>> are active. Unless I'm mistaken, noone else has currently time to work
>> on the OpenStack package issues. To address this problem I propose
>> that my company hires a Debian GNU/Linux packager to resolve this
>> crisis. Please let me know if you have a better idea.
> Do we need a DD to do this? If not, I can arrange someone with enough
> deb packaging experience to help.
Anyone could help indeed and there won't be any problems finding a sponsor for the packages ;-) Could you ask her/him to drop by on irc.oftc.net#debian-openstack to discuss contributions ?

Cheers
>
>> Cheers
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: 	[Openstack-devel] keystone REMOVED from testing
>> Date: 	Mon, 28 May 2012 16:39:14 +0000
>> From: 	Debian testing watch <noreply at release.debian.org>
>> To: 	keystone at packages.debian.org
>>
>> FYI: The status of the keystone source package
>> in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
>>
>>   Previous version: 2012.1-2
>>   Current version:  (not in testing)
>>   Hint: <http://release.debian.org/britney/hints/nthykier>
>>     #20120528
>>     #20120528
>>
>> The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
>> reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
>> were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
>> reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
>> probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
>> actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.


-- 
Loïc Dachary         Chief Research Officer
// eNovance labs   http://labs.enovance.com
// ✉ loic at enovance.com  ☎ +33 1 49 70 99 82