[Parted-maintainers] Bug#380226: Bug#379835: Recommend to tag
#380226 "etch-ignore"; #379835 downgraded to important
aba at not.so.argh.org
Mon Dec 4 16:00:00 CET 2006
(restricting to #380226)
* Frans Pop (elendil at planet.nl) [061122 14:16]:
> On Saturday 11 November 2006 04:21, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > But again, I don't understand how libparted has a bug separate from the
> > linux-ntfs one.
> > I'm not sure there's any reason this bug would be specific to NTFS
> > partitions, though, is there?
> libparted causes the starting sector of the partition to change, thus
> making the physical partition invalid. This bug is indeed not even
> strictly related to Vista partitions, but other partitions seem to get
> created aligned on cylinder boundaries by default (or we'd have seen a
> lot more bug reports).
> > Your rationale for ignoring 380226 also makes no sense to me; if this
> > bug manifests in the installer, isn't that still a data loss bug that
> > we need to fix before release? There are also two other packages in
> > testing, gparted and mindi, which use libparted, so if there's a
> > dataloss-causing bug in libparted I don't see that it's ignorable even
> > if we did accept an argument that data loss in the installer is ok
> > (which I don't).
> There are a few reasons why I thought we could tag the libparted issue
> 1) it is not a regression from Sarge
> 2) there has been precious little attention to the issue from the
> maintainers of parted even though the BR was already 3 months old;
> I talked to Otavio today though and he promised to start on it
Any news on this, Otavio? I don't want to tag it etch-ignore if that
would mean the bug would just be ignored.
More information about the Parted-maintainers