[Parted-maintainers] Bug#646130: Re: Bug#754582: transition: parted

Colin Watson cjwatson at debian.org
Sun Jul 13 00:11:47 UTC 2014


On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 06:17:19PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote:
> On 07/12/2014 05:20 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > Thanks.  Obviously it would be nice to trim down the patch stack 
> > further, and I would like to ship 3.2 in jessie, but if you don't
> > mind I think I'll go ahead with what I have for now.  According to 
> > libparted/Makefile.am there doesn't seem to be an ABI change
> > (although I expect that at least AGE will be bumped before release
> > ...), so once we're at a vaguely reasonable baseline it should be
> > easy enough to upgrade to 3.2 shortly afterwards.
> 
> Sure, if you have already packaged 3.1 then go ahead, I just thought
> if you hadn't started yet you might want to go with the rc.

Ah, I have it pretty much ready.

> I don't think anything has been added to the ABI, so AGE doesn't need
> bumped does it?

Sorry, I meant REVISION.  I'd expect 2:0:0 -> 2:1:0 for a new release
without ABI additions/removals/changes, per the libtool docs.

-- 
Colin Watson                                       [cjwatson at debian.org]



More information about the Parted-maintainers mailing list