Bug#836940: [buildd-tools-devel] Bug#836940: cowbuilder, sbuild: should behave identically in regard to default gnupg installation

gregor herrmann gregoa at debian.org
Wed Sep 7 14:40:52 UTC 2016


On Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:05:24 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:

> > The package xmlgraphics-commons started recently failing to build from
> > source in a clean sbuild environment although it was built successfully
> > on the buildd network a few months ago. This behavior cannot be observed
> > in a clean cowbuilder environment though. [1]

> > 3. or if cowbuilder should not install gnupg by default
> I think it should not because I think that source packages should be compiled
> in an environment that is as minimal as possible for the reasons given above.
> But of course this is up to the cowbuilder maintainers.

FWIW, I don't have a /usr/bin/gpg in my {amd64,i386} {stretch,sid}
cowbuilder chroots. But they are present in older ones.

I suspect I don't have them anymore because I clean my chroots (with
debfoster), and others might still have gnupg installed because it
was originally installed but never removed.

(I haven't tried, but I guess creating a new cowbuilder chroot won't
have gnupg either.) 

Cheers,
gregor


-- 
 .''`.  Homepage https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06
 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer -  https://www.debian.org/
 `. `'  Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   NP: Ludwig Hirsch: Der Kater
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 931 bytes
Desc: Digital Signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pbuilder-maint/attachments/20160907/4cf7ba10/attachment.sig>


More information about the Pbuilder-maint mailing list