Bug#64308: state of #64308

[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]

Hello Joey,

>CGI::Cookie would lead you to belive it follows RFC 2109, when it says
>For full information on cookies see
>http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/rfc2109.txt
I wouldn't read this as 'conforms to', nevertheless:

>CGI::Cookie uses only the old
>expires field that is in the old netscape cookies spec.
This is still the case with Perl 5.10.1. Is it still a problem with any
browser? Should I forward upstream the request to implement 'Max-Age' now?

>Note: For backward compatibility, the separator in the Cookie header
>   is semi-colon (;) everywhere.  A server should also accept comma (,)
>   as the separator between cookie-values for future compatibility.
This part works well for me in Perl 5.10.1.

-- 
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++/Perl developer, Debian Developer

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/perl-maintainers/attachments/20091016/7cec08d1/attachment-0001.pgp>