Author: holger
Date: 2009-06-20 12:05:37 +0000 (Sat, 20 Jun 2009)
New Revision: 441
Modified:
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/detect_well_known_errors
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_by_many_packages_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf
piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf
Log:
htmlify
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/detect_well_known_errors
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/detect_well_known_errors 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/detect_well_known_errors 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -46,13 +46,15 @@
echo "$COMMAND" > $LOGS
if [ -s $LOGS ] ; then
OUTPUT=$HTDOCS/$SECTION/${problem%.conf}.tpl
- echo "$HELPTEXT" > $OUTPUT
- echo >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<p>$HELPTEXT</p>" > $OUTPUT
COUNT=$(cut -d "_" -f1 $LOGS|sort -u|wc -l)
- echo "Affected packages in $SECTION: " $COUNT >> $OUTPUT
- echo >> $OUTPUT
- cat $LOGS | sed -e "s#^#http://piuparts.debian.org/$SECTION/#g" >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<p>Affected packages in $SECTION: $COUNT</p>" >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<ul>" >> $OUTPUT
+ for LOG in $(cat LOGS) ; do
+ echo "<li><a href='/$LOG'>$LOG</a></li>" >> $OUTPUT
+ done
echo "$LOGS" >> ${KNOWNLOGS[$NR]}
+ echo "</ul>" >> $OUTPUT
else
touch ${KNOWNLOGS[$NR]}
fi
@@ -76,14 +78,15 @@
done
if [ -s $LOGS ] ; then
OUTPUT=$HTDOCS/$SECTION/unknown_failures.tpl
- echo > $OUTPUT
- echo "Packages with failures not yet well known detected. Please investigate!" >> $OUTPUT
- echo >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<h2>Packages with failures not yet well known detected</h2>
+ echo "<p>Please investigate and improve detection of known error types!</p>" >> $OUTPUT
COUNT=$(cut -d "_" -f1 $LOGS|sort -u|wc -l)
- echo >> $OUTPUT
- echo "Affected packages in $SECTION: " $COUNT >> $OUTPUT
- echo >> $OUTPUT
- cat "$LOGS" | sed -e "s#^#http://piuparts.debian.org/$SECTION/#g" >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<p>Affected packages in $SECTION: $COUNT</p>" >> $OUTPUT
+ echo "<ul>" >> $OUTPUT
+ for LOG in $(cat LOGS) ; do
+ echo "<li><a href='/$LOG'>$LOG</a></li>" >> $OUTPUT
+ done
+ echo "</ul>" >> $OUTPUT
fi
rm $LOGS ${KNOWNLOGS[$NR]} $UNKNOWNLOGS
let "NR += 1"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,18 +3,29 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "command not found" fail|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="Packages with failed logs with the string 'command not found' in them.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>Packages with failed logs with the string 'command not found'
+</h2>
+
+<p>
WARNING: it has not been verified that this error really caused the package to
fail the piuparts test.
-In fact, there are also successful logs with 'command not found' in them.
+<br>In fact, there are also successful logs with 'command not found' in them.
+</p>
+<p>
From the third paragraph about the meaning of the depends field in
-http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps</a>
+</p>
+<pre>
The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or postrm scripts
require the package to be present in order to run. __Note, however, that the
postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the
purge phase__.
+</pre>
-Please file bugs!"
-
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,12 +3,21 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "command not found" pass|grep -v "/var/lib/dpkg/info/openssh-client.postrm: line 34: delgroup: command not found" |cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=1
-HELPTEXT="Packages which passed the piuparts test but have logs with the string 'command not found' in them.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>Packages which passed the piuparts test but have logs with the string 'command not found'</h2>
-Failures due to #530501 (/var/lib/dpkg/info/openssh-client.postrm: line 34: delgroup: command not found) have been ignored.
+<p>Failures due to #530501 (/var/lib/dpkg/info/openssh-client.postrm: line 34: delgroup: command not found) have been ignored.</p>
-From the third paragraph about the meaning of the depends field in http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps
+<p>From the third paragraph about the meaning of the depends field in http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps</p>
-The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or postrm scripts require the package to be present in order to run. __Note, however, that the postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the purge phase__.
+<pre>
+The Depends field should also be used if the postinst, prerm or postrm scripts
+require the package to be present in order to run. __Note, however, that the
+postrm cannot rely on any non-essential packages to be present during the
+purge phase__.
+</pre>
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,6 +3,16 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "not owned" fail|grep usr/local/|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="Packages with files and/or directories in /usr/local/ after purge, which is a violation of policy 9.1.2: see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>
+Packages with files and/or directories in /usr/local/ after purge
+</h2>
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+This is a violation of policy 9.1.2: see
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2</a>
+
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,8 +3,19 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep -E "trying to overwrite (.*) which is also in package" fail|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="Packages with failed logs because they tried to overwrite other packages files.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>
+Packages with failed logs because they tried to overwrite other packages files
+</h2>
-This is because the package tries to overwrite another packages files without declaring a conflict or replaces relation. See policy 7.4 and 7.6 at http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-conflicts and http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+<p>
+This is because the package tries to overwrite another packages files without declaring a conflict or replaces relation. See policy 7.4 and 7.6 at
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-conflicts'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-conflicts</a>
+and
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces</a>
+</p>
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,8 +3,21 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "owned by:" fail|grep -v ","|grep -v usr/local/|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="WARNING: this list might contain false positives.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>
+Packages with owned files after purge
+</h2>
-Packages need to remove owned files after purge, see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3
+<p>
+WARNING: this list might contain false positives.
+</p>
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+Packages need to remove owned files after purge, see
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3</a>
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_by_many_packages_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_by_many_packages_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/owned_files_by_many_packages_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,6 +3,16 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "owned by" fail|grep "," |cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="Packages with failed logs which have conffiles owned by two or more packages which are not removed by dpkg correctly. So these might be ok packages (or not, as there might be other problems), but we cannot know until dpkg is fixed.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>
+Packages with failed logs which have conffiles owned by two or more packages which are not removed by dpkg correctly
+</h2>
-Please file this important bug against dpkg!"
+<p>
+So these might be ok packages (or not, as there might be other problems), but we cannot know until dpkg is fixed.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Please file this important bug against dpkg!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,8 +3,18 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "ERROR: FAIL: Processes are running inside chroot" fail|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="Packages with failed logs because there were processes running inside the chroot at the end of the piuparts run.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>
+Packages with failed logs because of processes left behind
+</h2>
-This is probably due to directly calling /etc/rc.d/ scripts in packages maintainer scripts, which is a violation of policy 9.3.3.2 and must be replaced by using policy-rc.d - see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3
+<p>
+There were processes running inside the chroot at the end of the piuparts run.
+This is probably due to directly calling /etc/rc.d/ scripts in packages maintainer scripts, which is a violation of policy 9.3.3.2 and must be replaced by using policy-rc.d - see
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3</a>.
+</p>
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>
+"
Modified: piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf
===================================================================
--- piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf 2009-06-20 10:52:56 UTC (rev 440)
+++ piatti/home/piupartsm/bin/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf 2009-06-20 12:05:37 UTC (rev 441)
@@ -3,12 +3,20 @@
#
COMMAND=`rgrep "not owned" fail|grep -v "/usr/share/mime/"|grep -v usr/local/|cut -d " " -f1|sed -e "s#log:#log#"|sort -u 2>/dev/null`
ISSUE=0
-HELPTEXT="WARNING: this list might contain false positives.
+HELPTEXT="
+<h2>Packages with unowned files after purge
+</h2>
-One group of them are packages with files in /usr/share/mime - those are bugs from shared-mime-info (#527063) and have been ignored for this list.
+<p>
+WARNING: this list might contain false positives. One group of them are packages with files in /usr/share/mime - those are bugs from shared-mime-info (#527063) and have been ignored for this list.
+There are probably others like this as well.
+</p>
-WARNING: there are probably others like this as well.
+<p>
+Packages with unowned files after purge (violating policy 6.8) see
+<a href='http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails'>http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails</a>
+</p>
-Packages with unowned files after purge (violating policy 6.8) see http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
-
-Please file bugs!"
+<p>
+Please file bugs!
+</p>"