[Piuparts-commits] [piuparts] 01/05: update policy references, the permalinks changed with the new toolchain
Holger Levsen
holger at layer-acht.org
Mon Nov 20 10:25:38 UTC 2017
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
holger pushed a commit to branch develop
in repository piuparts.
commit 34fa2e08000e1b29061f0735e4f8f95cf1f1c8ee
Author: Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>
Date: Mon Nov 20 09:18:48 2017 +0100
update policy references, the permalinks changed with the new toolchain
Signed-off-by: Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen <holger at layer-acht.org>
---
TODO | 2 ++
bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail | 4 ++--
bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
...grade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
.../fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail | 4 ++--
.../owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail | 4 ++--
bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.mail | 2 +-
...e_to_modified_conffiles_which_were_not_modified_by_the_user.mail | 2 +-
...out_following_Debian_Configuration_Management_Specification.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/removal_makes_files_disappear.mail | 5 +++--
bug-templates/removes_files_installed_by_other_package.mail | 6 +++---
bug-templates/unhandled_symlink_to_directory_conversion.mail | 4 ++--
...d_directories_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_9.1.2.mail | 4 ++--
bug-templates/unowned_directory_after_purge.mail | 2 +-
bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_10.8.mail | 2 +-
...d_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_violating_FHS_policy_9.1_too.mail | 4 ++--
.../unowned_files_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8.mail | 4 ++--
bug-templates/unowned_ls-R_file_in_usr_local_after_purge.mail | 4 ++--
debian/changelog | 1 +
htdocs/bug_howto.tpl | 2 +-
known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_issue.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/conffile_prompt_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/cron_error_after_removal_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/missing_alternative_inadequate_issue.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_issue.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/processes_running_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/program_name_collision_inadequate_issue.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf | 2 +-
known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_issue.conf | 2 +-
49 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
diff --git a/TODO b/TODO
index 3db1541..18ef482 100644
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ expressed…
for 0.8x, during the buster development cycle:
+- fix policy reference for old footnote 53, blocked by #879048
+
- README_server.txt: rewrite style a bit more. its super easy to setup now!
- ==== piuparts.debian.org specific configuration
diff --git a/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail b/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail
index 0d153d8..7912dad 100644
--- a/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Hi,
a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#copyright-information
After the upgrade /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/ is just an empty directory.
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ https://wiki.debian.org/MissingCopyrightFile
Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with symlinks
and vice versa, you need the maintainer scripts to do this.
See in particular the end of point 4 in
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-unpackphase
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
It is recommended to use the dpkg-maintscript-helper commands
'dir_to_symlink' and 'symlink_to_dir' (available since dpkg 1.17.14)
diff --git a/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail b/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail
index 3c8a70f..c6284a2 100644
--- a/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes
where it shouldn't. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d
as mandated by policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously disturbing! ;-)
-See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3
+See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#interfacing-with-init-systems
and /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz as well
as /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d.gz
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail
index a72663f..9ebd947 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 274cd48..a1d4a4c 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite files that are owned by other packages
without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
This problem is exposed during the upgrade of the 'EXPOSER'
package, not by upgrading only the buggy package itself.
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 099e0af..38cc920 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 3058aa3..c9756df 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ but then the upgrade to 'wheezy' failed because it tries to overwrite
other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 3674a38..8746a6a 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index b06deaf..4ac60d4 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 06baaa3..daf35f9 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
This test intentionally skipped 'testing' to find file overwrite
problems before packages migrate from 'unstable' to 'testing'.
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index e50c2ef..bc73201 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index 44547a2..a9581a5 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
index a9eaa57..6606ca0 100644
--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
Breaks+Replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail b/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail
index 2844b63..8eb37e2 100644
--- a/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ It may break in subtle ways and dpkg cannot detect this as a problem.
"win" and all others have "lost".
Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with
symlinks and vice versa, see in particular the end of point 4 in
- https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-unpackphase
+ https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
(Note: Adding Pre-Depends is *not* a solution.)
Please move the files shipped in your package to the "real" location.
diff --git a/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail b/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail
index 081b314..5c982ba 100644
--- a/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
The leftover files are actually alternatives that were installed by the
package but have not been properly removed.
diff --git a/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail b/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail
index d03cc07..a0730b0 100644
--- a/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed the maintainer scripts of your
package don't support all the ways they are going to be called.
See policy 6.5 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-mscriptsinstact
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#summary-of-ways-maintainer-scripts-are-called
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail b/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail
index 0d540ca..c942ee5 100644
--- a/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
This is forbidden by the policy, see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s-config-files
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#configuration-files
10.7.3: "[...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the
configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default
diff --git a/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail b/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
index 3005180..3fbf59a 100644
--- a/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 and 10.7.3:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail b/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
index 63c9bbf..4829c33 100644
--- a/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8 and 10.7.3:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail b/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail
index 91536fd..65fb897 100644
--- a/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The following relationships are currently defined:
The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of
these files
-(https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces):
+(https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces):
Package:
Breaks:
diff --git a/bug-templates/postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.mail b/bug-templates/postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.mail
index 85ea3cf..05816c0 100644
--- a/bug-templates/postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/postinst_uses_usr_share_doc.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
/usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts which is a violation of
Policy 12.3: "Packages must not require the existence of any files in
/usr/share/doc/ in order to function."
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s12.3
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#additional-documentation
These files must be moved to /usr/share/$PACKAGE and may be symlinked
from /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE.
diff --git a/bug-templates/prompting_due_to_modified_conffiles_which_were_not_modified_by_the_user.mail b/bug-templates/prompting_due_to_modified_conffiles_which_were_not_modified_by_the_user.mail
index 35e00f6..418873c 100644
--- a/bug-templates/prompting_due_to_modified_conffiles_which_were_not_modified_by_the_user.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/prompting_due_to_modified_conffiles_which_were_not_modified_by_the_user.mail
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile
at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded...
This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3,
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior,
which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary
questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good
citizens."
diff --git a/bug-templates/prompts_user_without_following_Debian_Configuration_Management_Specification.mail b/bug-templates/prompts_user_without_following_Debian_Configuration_Management_Specification.mail
index 9950507..a7f68ac 100644
--- a/bug-templates/prompts_user_without_following_Debian_Configuration_Management_Specification.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/prompts_user_without_following_Debian_Configuration_Management_Specification.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Configuration Management Specification, version 2 or higher.
Refer to Debian Policy Manual section 3.9.1 (Prompting in maintainer
scripts) for details. Quoting from
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-maintscriptprompt
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#prompting-in-maintainer-scripts
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ 3.9.1 Prompting in maintainer scripts ]
diff --git a/bug-templates/removal_makes_files_disappear.mail b/bug-templates/removal_makes_files_disappear.mail
index 2376dee..aa23876 100644
--- a/bug-templates/removal_makes_files_disappear.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/removal_makes_files_disappear.mail
@@ -27,9 +27,10 @@ but the following files have disappeared:
This is a serious bug violating policy 7.6, see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
and also see the footnote that describes this incorrect behavior
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/footnotes.html#f53
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ (old: footnotes.html#f53)
+[footnote permalink broken (#879048), search for /To see why/]
The $OFFENDER package has the following relationships with $VICTIM:
diff --git a/bug-templates/removes_files_installed_by_other_package.mail b/bug-templates/removes_files_installed_by_other_package.mail
index ab738ad..e8bae72 100644
--- a/bug-templates/removes_files_installed_by_other_package.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/removes_files_installed_by_other_package.mail
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ they may have been shipped or created by a dependency.
This could be a violation of policy 10.7.4 ("Sharing configuration
files"), see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.4
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#sharing-configuration-files
or policy chapter 6 ("Package maintainer scripts..."), see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#package-maintainer-scripts-and-installation-procedure
or policy 7.6 ("Overwriting files..."), see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
If a directory is used by several packages, all should ship it as part
of the package (possibly empty, using $package.dirs to create it), and
diff --git a/bug-templates/unhandled_symlink_to_directory_conversion.mail b/bug-templates/unhandled_symlink_to_directory_conversion.mail
index 58cfba0..692726f 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unhandled_symlink_to_directory_conversion.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unhandled_symlink_to_directory_conversion.mail
@@ -24,14 +24,14 @@ packages are installed, ship byte-for-byte identical files and are
upgraded in lockstep. But once one of the involved packages gets
removed, the other one will lose its documentation files, too,
including the copyright file, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#copyright-information
For other overwritten locations anything interesting may happen.
Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with symlinks
and vice versa, you need the maintainer scripts to do this.
See in particular the end of point 4 in
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-unpackphase
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
It is recommended to use the dpkg-maintscript-helper commands
'dir_to_symlink' and 'symlink_to_dir' (available since dpkg 1.17.14)
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_directories_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_9.1.2.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_directories_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_9.1.2.mail
index fb479df..1e293c6 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_directories_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_9.1.2.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_directories_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_9.1.2.mail
@@ -12,14 +12,14 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
Leaving directories in /usr/local after purge is also a violation of a
should-directive in
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs
cheers,
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_directory_after_purge.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_directory_after_purge.mail
index b2e7002..4522042 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_directory_after_purge.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_directory_after_purge.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean archive is a release
goal since lenny.
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_10.8.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_10.8.mail
index 44dcf17..b3d0691 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_10.8.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_and_10.8.mail
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 (or 10.8):
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
Filing this as important as having a piuparts clean archive is a release
goal since lenny.
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_violating_FHS_policy_9.1_too.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_violating_FHS_policy_9.1_too.mail
index 3c4b966..a796a4d 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_violating_FHS_policy_9.1_too.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_violating_FHS_policy_9.1_too.mail
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs
I'm setting the severity to serious.
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_files_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_files_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8.mail
index 96eac86..bbffb90 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_files_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_files_in_usr_local_after_purge_policy_6.8.mail
@@ -12,13 +12,13 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs
I'm setting the severity to serious.
diff --git a/bug-templates/unowned_ls-R_file_in_usr_local_after_purge.mail b/bug-templates/unowned_ls-R_file_in_usr_local_after_purge.mail
index 6c8c10c..af2f4ac 100644
--- a/bug-templates/unowned_ls-R_file_in_usr_local_after_purge.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/unowned_ls-R_file_in_usr_local_after_purge.mail
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
As putting files into /usr/local is also a violation of
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs
I'm setting the severity to serious.
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 86ccee8..312320f 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ piuparts (0.83) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
piuparts-report to exclude (most of) these logfiles from the report.
* master-bin/report_newly_bugged_packages: Remove, merged into
piuparts-analyze.
+ * Update policy references, the permalinks changed with the new toolchain.
[ Holger Levsen ]
* dwke.py/-analyze.py/-report.py: quietly exit if another process is still
diff --git a/htdocs/bug_howto.tpl b/htdocs/bug_howto.tpl
index ec1ca21..a71e13f 100644
--- a/htdocs/bug_howto.tpl
+++ b/htdocs/bug_howto.tpl
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
declaring a replaces relation.
See policy 7.6 at
- https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
+ https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):
diff --git a/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_error.conf b/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_error.conf
index 1ee70d7..cce26de 100644
--- a/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_error.conf
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ HEADER='Packages with leftover alternatives after purge'
HELPTEXT='
<p>
Packages with unowned files in /etc/alternatives after purge (violating policy 6.8) see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging</a>
</p>
<p>
Alternatives are usually registered with update-alternatives in <b>postinst configure</b> and need to be unregistered again in <b>prerm remove</b>.
diff --git a/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_issue.conf b/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_issue.conf
index 27ee4ba..fe052a7 100644
--- a/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/alternatives_after_purge_issue.conf
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ HEADER='Packages with leftover alternatives after purge'
HELPTEXT='
<p>
Packages with unowned files in /etc/alternatives after purge (violating policy 6.8) see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging</a>
</p>
<p>
Alternatives are usually registered with update-alternatives in <b>postinst configure</b> and need to be unregistered again in <b>prerm remove</b>.
diff --git a/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf b/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf
index 510fabe..4aa67fc 100644
--- a/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/command_not_found_error.conf
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ HEADER='Packages with failed logs with the string "command not found"'
HELPTEXT='
<p>
From the third paragraph about the meaning of the depends field in
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#binary-dependencies-depends-recommends-suggests-enhances-pre-depends" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#binary-dependencies-depends-recommends-suggests-enhances-pre-depends</a>
</p>
<pre>
diff --git a/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf b/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf
index d7ba518..e3a883f 100644
--- a/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/command_not_found_issue.conf
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ISSUE=1
HEADER='Packages which passed the piuparts test but have logs with the string "command not found"'
HELPTEXT='
<p>From the third paragraph about the meaning of the depends field in
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-binarydeps</a>:
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#binary-dependencies-depends-recommends-suggests-enhances-pre-depends" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#binary-dependencies-depends-recommends-suggests-enhances-pre-depends</a>:
</p>
<pre>
diff --git a/known_problems/conffile_prompt_error.conf b/known_problems/conffile_prompt_error.conf
index 1a6c5bd..4c7e610 100644
--- a/known_problems/conffile_prompt_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/conffile_prompt_error.conf
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ HELPTEXT='
The piuparts upgrade test failed because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails. But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded...
</p>
<p>
-This is explained in detail in policy 10.7.3 at <a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3</a> which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good citizens."
+This is explained in detail in policy 10.7.3 at <a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior</a> which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good citizens."
</p>
<p>
According to the thread started at <a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html" target="_blank">200908191215.05079.holger at layer-acht.org</a> these bugs are to be filed with severity <b>serious</b>.
diff --git a/known_problems/cron_error_after_removal_error.conf b/known_problems/cron_error_after_removal_error.conf
index 1e1dcc8..e6abe49 100644
--- a/known_problems/cron_error_after_removal_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/cron_error_after_removal_error.conf
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ ISSUE=0
HEADER='Packages with failed logs because a cron file has output and/or exits with error after the package has been removed'
HELPTEXT='
<p>
-From <a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.5" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.5</a>
+From <a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#cron-jobs" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#cron-jobs</a>
</p>
<pre>
diff --git a/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf b/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf
index 61b8903..f05c9ec 100644
--- a/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/files_in_usr_local_error.conf
@@ -8,6 +8,6 @@ HEADER='Packages with files and/or directories in /usr/local/ after purge'
HELPTEXT='
<p>
This is a violation of policy 9.1.2: see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.1.2</a>.
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#site-specific-programs</a>.
</p>
'
diff --git a/known_problems/missing_alternative_inadequate_issue.conf b/known_problems/missing_alternative_inadequate_issue.conf
index 20a5ca6..b3023a4 100644
--- a/known_problems/missing_alternative_inadequate_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/missing_alternative_inadequate_issue.conf
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ WHERE='pass fail bugged affected'
ISSUE=1
HEADER="Packages tagged 'missing-alternative' by adequate"
HELPTEXT="
-<p>Running <a href="https://packages.debian.org/adequate" target="_blank">adequate</a> resulted in the package being tagged 'missing-alternative' which indicates a bug similar to this situation: a package is a provider of the virtual package 'x-terminal-emulator', but it doesn't register itself as an alternative for '/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator'. See debian-policy 11.8.3 and 11.8.4.
+<p>Running <a href="https://packages.debian.org/adequate" target="_blank">adequate</a> resulted in the package being tagged 'missing-alternative' which indicates a bug similar to this situation: a package is a provider of the virtual package 'x-terminal-emulator', but it doesn't register itself as an alternative for '/usr/bin/x-terminal-emulator'. See policy 11.8.3 and 11.8.4.
</p>
"
diff --git a/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf b/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf
index b1da754..6b489b5 100644
--- a/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/overwrite_other_packages_files_error.conf
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ HEADER='Packages with failed logs because they tried to overwrite other packages
HELPTEXT='
<p>
This is because the package tries to overwrite another packages files without declaring a replaces relation. See policy 7.6 at
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces</a>.
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces</a>.
</p>
<p>
According to the thread started at <a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00234.html" target="_blank">200908071233.02813.holger at layer-acht.org</a> these bugs are to be filed with severity <b>serious</b>.
diff --git a/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf b/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf
index fafa79d..cde1cc5 100644
--- a/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_error.conf
@@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ WARNING: this list might contain false positives.
<p>
Packages need to remove owned files after purge, see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior</a>
</p>
'
diff --git a/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_issue.conf b/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
index 848cbb8..fa46cf6 100644
--- a/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/owned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
@@ -13,6 +13,6 @@ WARNING: this list might contain false positives.
<p>
Packages need to remove owned files after purge, see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior</a>
</p>
'
diff --git a/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf b/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf
index b41e2d3..2be281b 100644
--- a/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/processes_running_error.conf
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ HELPTEXT='
<p>
There were processes running inside the chroot at the end of the piuparts run.
This is probably due to directly calling /etc/rc.d/ scripts in packages maintainer scripts, which is a violation of policy 9.3.3.2 and must be replaced by using invoke-rc.d (which will respect an optionally existing policy-rc.d) - see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3</a>, /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz and /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d.gz.
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#interfacing-with-init-systems" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#interfacing-with-init-systems</a>, /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz and /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d.gz.
</p>
<p>
According to the thread started at <a href="https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00182.html" target="_blank">200908061127.35727.holger at layer-acht.org</a> these bugs are to be filed with severity <b>serious</b>.
diff --git a/known_problems/program_name_collision_inadequate_issue.conf b/known_problems/program_name_collision_inadequate_issue.conf
index c495dfa..9703651 100644
--- a/known_problems/program_name_collision_inadequate_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/program_name_collision_inadequate_issue.conf
@@ -6,6 +6,6 @@ WHERE='pass fail bugged affected'
ISSUE=1
HEADER="Packages tagged 'program-name-collision' by adequate"
HELPTEXT="
-<p>Running <a href="https://packages.debian.org/adequate" target="_blank">adequate</a> resulted in the package being tagged 'program-name-collision' which indicates that this package ships a program with the same name as another program. This is a violation of debian-policy 10.1.
+<p>Running <a href="https://packages.debian.org/adequate" target="_blank">adequate</a> resulted in the package being tagged 'program-name-collision' which indicates that this package ships a program with the same name as another program. This is a violation of policy 10.1.
</p>
"
diff --git a/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf b/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf
index a7e4359..9c5836f 100644
--- a/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf
+++ b/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_error.conf
@@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ There are probably others like this as well.
<p>
Packages with unowned files after purge (violating policy 6.8) see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging</a>
</p>
'
diff --git a/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_issue.conf b/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
index d1a42e7..f9c008f 100644
--- a/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
+++ b/known_problems/unowned_files_after_purge_issue.conf
@@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ There are probably others like this as well.
<p>
Packages with unowned files after purge (violating policy 6.8) see
-<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#s-removedetails</a>
+<a href="https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging" target="_blank">https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging</a>
</p>
'
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/piuparts/piuparts.git
More information about the Piuparts-commits
mailing list