Bug#883156: version 1.1

Paolo Greppi paolo.greppi at libpf.com
Mon Dec 11 05:48:34 UTC 2017


Il 10/12/2017 21:16, Samuel Thibault ha scritto:
> Hello,
> 
> Paolo Greppi, on lun. 04 déc. 2017 18:24:46 +0100, wrote:
>> P.S. IMHO it would make sense to separate the libttspico-utils binary package from the svox source package.
>> In this way it would have its own version number, plus the code would not be in a patch 
>> but in plaintext.
> 
> Indeed, it makes a lot of sense, it "just needs" to be done, any taker ? :)
> (it means: submitting the ITP, setting up a repo on alioth for the
> debian packaging, writing the packaging bits, and upload. I can quickly
> do the last step if all the previous steps are done).
> 
> Samuel

I can do the ITP and the packaging.

I propose to name the new source pico2wave.
It would produce a new binary pico2wave and a transitional libttspico-utils as per:
https://wiki.debian.org/RenamingPackages

Re. the repo on alioth, as a DM I can not write in git.debian.org:/git/collab-maint
so somebody should create the pico2wave.git directory in there and assign the owner to paolog-guest.
Or we place the repo somewhere else.

Paolo



More information about the Pkg-a11y-devel mailing list