[Pkg-ace-devel] Re: [ace-users] Re: Bug #1854 RESOLVED/FIXED: Reactor separation

[Raphael Bossek]

Hi Marek,

> 1. Do we really need ace(tao)_qtreactor mpc::features, namely requires 
> += ace(tao)_qtreactor in ace(tao)_qtreactor.mpb?
We do not. The same should be considered for the other *_reactor features
too.

> Why not to assume that if Qt feature is set, then ACE is compiled with 
> Qt support?
That is what the features are for.

> 2. Do we need all those Qt related options in
include/makeinclude/platform* ?
Hmm, I'm not sure because it is today possible to create projects on
Makefiles without MPC. Removing the Qt options whould break this. It's
important to know which options have to be set.

> Can we assume that user applications use include/makeinclude/platform* 
> files only vie MPC generated makefiles ?
No we can not!

> 3. Should ACE_QtReactor have their own folder in ACE_wrappers/ace, [...]
Not really. I would not create a extry subdirectory for 3-5 files.

--
Raphael Bossek

-- 
NEU +++ DSL Komplett von GMX +++ http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
GMX DSL-Netzanschluss + Tarif zum supergünstigen Komplett-Preis!