[Pkg-acpi-devel] Bug#605128: installation-reports: install from usb key on dell latitude e4200 (squeeze beta1)

Julien Cristau jcristau at debian.org
Sat Dec 4 23:07:51 UTC 2010


On Sat, Dec  4, 2010 at 20:49:09 +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 08:43:35PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 05:19:10PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> > > 
> > > - acpi-support-base depends console-tools | console-setup
> > 
> > I suppose it has to be considered a bug for a package to depend on 
> > console-tools and not on kbd.
> > 
> > On the other hand kbd has only the following recommendation:
> > 
> > > Recommends: console-data (>= 1999.08.29-13) | console-setup
> > 
> > Is it this that caused the installation of console-data?  If not, then 
> > what? 
> 
> I realised the bug is in acpi-support-base:
> 
> > Depends: acpid (>= 1.0.4), console-tools | console-utilities
> 
> No package should do this!  Console-tools must be replaced by kbd.  
> (Yes, console-tools depends on console-data).
> 
Yeah, I think that's what happens, but it's not enough.

acpi-support-base Depends: console-tools | console-utilities
console-tools Recommends: console-data, console-common
console-common Depends: console-data, kbd
kbd Recommends: console-data | console-setup

So all of console-common, console-data, kbd, and later console-setup get
installed.  I think we need to switch acpi-support-base to depend on kbd
instead of console-tools, and kbd to prefer console-setup over
console-data.

Cheers,
Julien
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-acpi-devel/attachments/20101205/a9518ad9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-acpi-devel mailing list