[pkg-bioc] paper seems fine, except ...

David Vernazobres dv at uni-muenster.de
Fri May 25 10:02:24 UTC 2007


Back in front of my computers...
Thanks to all for your nice work.
david

On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 10:07:24AM +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote :
> Hi Dirk et al.,
> 
> the paper is fine, except that I could not find the \footnote{To whom 
> correspondence should be addressed: edd at ...} Amazing that none of us spotted 
> that before.
> 
> The qtimes.sty that I downloaded from the web (first google hit) cannot 
> provide slanted or bold fonts ... this is my interpretation at least.  It 
> looks on my machine far better with the qtimes commented out or by using 
> times instead.  Now, this is an issue with _my_ setup, I was only afraid that 
> the organisers might run into similar issues. "apt-cache search qtimes" does 
> not return anything. What should I install instead? And, should it be worth a 
> comment in the .tex source?

$ apt-file search qtimes.sty 
tetex-extra: usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
tetex-extra: usr/share/texmf-tetex/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
texlive-lang-polish: usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty
texlive-lang-polish: usr/share/texmf-texlive/tex/latex/qfonts/qtimes.sty

> 
> On a sidenote: I just received about 20 mails from the list in one chunk, 
> between a day and two days old, due to some semi-disturbing work on the mail 
> servers and internet connections. It should be repared now as it seems, but 
> who knows.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Steffen
> 



More information about the pkg-bioc-devel mailing list