[Pkg-blender-maintainers] Random thoughts/todos about blender in debian

[Cyril Brulebois]

Florian Ernst <florian_ernst at gmx.net> (13/04/2007):
> Hmm, that depends. When uploading to unstable we get a larger user
> base and thus blender will get tested more thoroughly at the cost of a
> more bumpy ride for some (unstable) users. Provided all issues, if
> any, will be communicated upstream this might help getting a better
> 2.43a.  As Etch has just been released, now is quite a godd time for
> any bumpy rides outside of expiremental. :)

Alright, fine for unstable, then. And no explanation needed about how to
use experimental, I'm fine with that. :) And getting back the etch
package for the eventually unsatisfied users should be trivial.

> JFTR, this stuff was taken from Ubuntu in 2.42a-2. Given that Lukas
> Fittl just approached the list he might give some input on this as
> well.

I'll be talking with Lukas about this one, and send a digest to the
list.

> Well, for our purposes CVS seems to just work. Is changing to a
> different system really worth the effort? It's not that I'm opposed to
> a change, but I wouldn't like to change just for the sake of it.

Hmm, I'll have to learn more about tagging, then. But well, it's OK to
stick with cvs.

Cheers,

-- 
Cyril Brulebois
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-blender-maintainers/attachments/20070413/4716179a/attachment.pgp