<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0"><tr><td valign="top"><p dir=ltr>mmm if this was a temporary workaround for a build failure I think we are good now.</p>
<p dir=ltr>I think the missing symbols were somewhat related, I don't think mixing both static and dynamic libraries with the same symbols is the good thng to do, somewhere the symbols (I think because of debian patches) were not static corrected exported.</p>
<p dir=ltr>So for me is safe to go, we have so much time prior to the freeze, and the upload will have 10 more days until testing.</p>
<p dir=ltr>For the gcc patches I changed the missing libsched because I had some problems in patching the source (I didn't quilt push and patches weren't removing cleanly)</p>
<p dir=ltr>I can split them or add a brief patch description for this.</p>
<p dir=ltr>Anyway now with the power of git log having good commit messages is even more powerful than patch descriptions!</p>
<p dir=ltr>Cheers,</p>
<p dir=ltr>Gianfranco</p>
<p dir=ltr><a href="https://uk.overview.mail.yahoo.com/mobile/?.src=Android">Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android</a></p>
</td></tr></table>            <div id="_origMsg_">
                <div>
                    <br />
                    <div>
                        <div style="font-size:0.9em">
                            <hr size="1">
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold">From:</span>
                            </b>
                            GUO Yixuan <culu.gyx@gmail.com>;                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold">To:</span>
                            </b>
                            Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfranco@yahoo.it>;                                                     <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold">Cc:</span>
                            </b>
                            pkg-boinc-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org <pkg-boinc-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>;  <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>;                                                     <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold">Subject:</span>
                            </b>
                            Re: Boinc and future plans                            <br>
                            <b>
                                <span style="font-weight:bold">Sent:</span>
                            </b>
                            Sun, May 25, 2014 4:08:06 AM                            <br>
                        </div>
                            <br>
                            <table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
                                <tbody>
                                    <tr>
                                        <td valign="top">On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:18:09AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> I also uploaded the experimental package, to avoid the "new" queue<br clear="none">> again <br clear="none"><br clear="none">Yes, I agree it's useful and good to keep a version in experimental.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> (will it ever reach unstable? What is the status of the<br clear="none">> server packages?).<br clear="none"><br clear="none">no sure...<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> Just a few questions:<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> I fixed the gcc-4.9 build failure and another bug, but I didn't <br clear="none">> upload the patches since I'm not completely comfortable in them<br clear="none">> <a shape="rect"
 href="http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b04285b60c1d552f7715d5441bbf06427219b7f" target="_blank">http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b04285b60c1d552f7715d5441bbf06427219b7f</a><br clear="none">> <a shape="rect" href="http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ceb0b09971fc4faf2b5fd52bce89ef742c2dae02" target="_blank">http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-boinc/boinc.git;a=commitdiff;h=ceb0b09971fc4faf2b5fd52bce89ef742c2dae02</a><br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> specially the second commit is something that bothers me a lot <br clear="none">> (I removed the "-static" flag to many libraries, because gcc was <br clear="none">> throwing "undefined symbol" errors).<br clear="none"><br clear="none">I vaguely remember that the "-static" flags were kept, because of some<br clear="none">build failure when they
 were removed. But that was back in 2012, and<br clear="none">certainly gcc has changed. (although I don't see any connection<br clear="none">between "-static" and undefined symbols...)<br clear="none">> <br clear="none">> Are them ok for you?<br clear="none"><br clear="none">These patches appear to be fine. (and anyway we can fix them if there's<br clear="none">any problems.) My only minor suggestion is that it's better to separate<br clear="none">two (seemingly) unrelated patches into two commits.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">> the new gcc-4.9 is going to be uploaded as default really soon, and<br clear="none">> would be nice to don't be hit unprepared this time.<br clear="none"><br clear="none">Certainly nice, thank you a lot!<div class="yqt7794231894" id="yqtfd70158"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Cheers,</div><br clear="none"><br clear="none">Yixuan<div class="yqt7794231894" id="yqtfd50738"><br
 clear="none"></div></td>
                                    </tr>
                                </tbody>
                            </table>
                    </div>
                </div>
            </div>