[pkg-boost-devel] Upload of Boost 1.38

Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Fri May 22 11:35:24 UTC 2009


+ Steve M. Robbins (Fri, 22 May 2009 00:37:15 -0500):

> Hello again, Adeodato,

Hello!

> >   * a mass bug filing for packages build-depending on versioned packages
> >     to build-depend on the un-versioned ones instead

> Not yet done.

Okay; there're 11 of such packages AFAICS. I hope you'll be able to file
the bugs at some point in the future, though it's not the most urgent of
tasks.

> >   * an automatic rebuild of those packages already build-depending on
> >     the un-versioned ones (from Boost 1.34), and file bugs for those
> >     that fail

> I used rebuildd locally to build all such packages (99 by my
> reckoning) and found 69 succeed, while 30 fail to build.  I have just
> started going through the log files and have filed bugs for two of
> those.

I see.

> Do you suggest we remove boost now or wait for the 30 failures to be
> fixed?

I suggest you provide me with the list of packages that succeeded, so
that I can schedule Bin-NMUs at least for those.

I could also schedule all of them, and trust that the buildd admins will
file the bugs for the failures. Or is there some deeper investigation
that it's good to perform for each of the failures?

> > I???m foreseeing this won???t be a cup of tea, but it???s something that has
> > to be done just once. With a bit of luck, we???ll get rid of at least
> > boost 1.34 and 1.35, and ideally 1.37 as well.

> > Then, when Boost 1.39 comes along, please contact us again, and we???ll
> > figure out how to proceed.

> Boost 1.39 is already out ... :-)

Heh, I see. Well let's get rid of 1.34 first, by rebuilding against
1.38, and go from there, ack?

Cheers,

-- 
- Are you sure we're good?
- Always.
        -- Rory and Lorelai




More information about the pkg-boost-devel mailing list