<div dir="ltr">I confirm Chromium works well using the Stretch version 50.0.2661.94 on a new 64 bit system on the same machine as the buggy same version using a 32 bit system on different partition.<div>But how did security get the same version working on 32 bit?</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 6 May 2016 at 03:42, Bryan Cebuliak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bryan.cebuliak@gmail.com" target="_blank">bryan.cebuliak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><pre style="padding-top:8px;margin-top:0px;border-top-width:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);line-height:19.2px">Interestingly neither the new package chromium (50.0.2661.94-1~deb8u1)</pre><pre style="padding-top:8px;margin-top:0px;border-top-width:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);line-height:19.2px">[security] nor the prior stable version have the Aw <span style="line-height:19.2px;font-family:arial,sans-serif"> snap! in gmail bug, </span></pre><pre style="padding-top:8px;margin-top:0px;border-top-width:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);line-height:19.2px"><span style="line-height:19.2px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">unlike </span><span style="line-height:19.2px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">the Sid 50.0.2661.94 version.</span></pre><pre style="padding-top:8px;margin-top:0px;border-top-width:0px;color:rgb(0,0,0);line-height:19.2px"><span style="line-height:19.2px;font-family:arial,sans-serif">Same as 821463.</span></pre></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>