[Pkg-clamav-devel] Fixing #506114 by a separate upload or together with other stuff?

[Stephen Gran]

This one time, at band camp, Michael Tautschnig said:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > #506114 is about status_of_proc, which is not defined in etch's lsb. Somehow I
> > missed that point when fixing the original bug report. Anyway, a fix for that is
> > easy and only applies to etch-volatile. Should we thus have an upload to
> > etch-volatile fixing that one only (a volatile2 version then) to later have some
> > further stuff which should go in both unstable and etch-volatile nicely
> > synchronized? That is, -2 would have very much the same changelog and patches
> > for both of them?
> > 
> > If nobody objects I'd do an upload within the next 24 hours.
> > 
> 
> This has been further discussed with Stephen on IRC and we came to the agreement
> that in general not each and every commit should be merged from unstable to
> etch-volatile.  As such it doesn't make sense to have a separate upload.

Hmm, I thought what we agreed on was that we didn't need to pull the
changes to the milter init script, but the translations cleanup was
harmless, and the status_of_proc fix was important.  Sorry if I wasn't
clear earlier - I'm on call this weekend, and a little distracted.
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran at debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-clamav-devel/attachments/20081123/19177576/attachment.pgp