[Pkg-clamav-devel] havp has just pending bugs in BTS

Andreas Cadhalpun andreas.cadhalpun at googlemail.com
Fri Jul 24 19:02:52 UTC 2015


Hi Sebastian,

On 19.07.2015 23:30, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 09:25:34PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> That's great!
>> Maybe upstream can be convinced to integrate these patches?
> 
> I CCed him once and he didn't respond. I CCed him again I still hope he
> answers once :)

I see...
By the way, has there been an progress with tomsfastmath?

>> I think a new upload would make sense.
> 
> One think I noticed today is that it does not support LFS. The lintian page
> linked from PTS does not show this but the
> binary-file-built-without-LFS-support tag on lintian.d.o shows havp. Do we
> care?

I think we should, because LFS support has been a release goal since wheezy.

> It could get done it is just a little messy because you need to redo
> the configure script and you need to preserve parts of default.h.in because it
> does not only automake things :)

I'm sorry I don't understand what you mean here.
Simply adding '-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64' to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS in debian/rules
should be enough, or is there more to do?

> It would be probably nice to get this done…

Definitely. ;)

About the valgrind tests for clamav: they seem to fail randomly on some architectures.
I tried to reproduce the amd64 failure locally, but when building with cowbuilder in
a sid/amd64 chroot, check5 and check6 failed with an invalid free crash.
However, when building with sbuild in a sid/amd64 schroot, both tests pass...

Thus it seems to me that these valgrind tests are just too flaky to be useful.

Best regards,
Andreas



More information about the Pkg-clamav-devel mailing list