UNS: Do we need an unofficial debian repository?

Christoph Egger christoph at debian.org
Mon Jul 12 15:36:26 UTC 2010


"Desmond O. Chang" <dochang at gmail.com> writes:
> The team is inactive now.  People's bugreports and patches don't get
> any response.  Many packages have been removed, many are out of date.
> I think the slow and complicated uploading process is why the team
> lacks contributors.
>
> Shall we need an unofficial repo like emacs.orebokech.com to renew the
> removed and outdated packages?

    I'm not necessarily convinced this would help anything. If there
were active people, getting DM status (enough for uploading packages)
shouldn't be that hard.

    As you might have noticed, I've recently joined the team and if
there were some sponsoring requests I guess I could handle a few of them
per week quite easily right now (supposed I feel able to handle them
wouldn't upload e.g. clc probably).

Regards

    Christoph



More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list