Bug#572967: sbcl 1.0.40 works fine on debian/sid amd64

Faré fahree at gmail.com
Thu Jul 22 15:54:02 UTC 2010


I don't see any obvious error message in either of your logs. Looks
like it ends up successfully dumping a c-l-c image in both cases.
(What is obvious is that c-l-c should disable compiler optimization
notes by default, though - who's in charge of c-l-c? Should I file a
bug?)

What exactly breaks for you?

[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
Early in life I had to choose between honest arrogance and hypocritical
humility. I chose honest arrogance and have seen no occasion to change.
        — Frank LLoyd Wright




On 22 July 2010 11:42, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar at debian.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> * Alexander Reichle-Schmehl <tolimar at debian.org> [100722 17:37]:
>
>> >     I've installed sbcl in a clean sid (amd64) chroot (main system is
>> > i386 with amd64 kern) started sbcl and (require)d some libraries
>> > (cl-irc) which all went well. If it's still breaking for you I'll have
>> > to discuss this with upstream
>> I could reproduce the problem in a pure amd64 environment.  I'm waiting
>> for the i386 chroot to finish upgrading to see if it makes a difference.
>
> That was faster than I thought.  I can reproduce the problem on in
> uptodate sid chroots on amd64 as well as i386 (on amd64 system).  Full
> logs attached.
>





More information about the pkg-common-lisp-devel mailing list