[Pkg-cups-devel] Bug#619461: Bug#619461: Bug#619461: cups-pdf: PDFVer and GSCall keys not taken into account
Martin-Éric Racine
q-funk at iki.fi
Thu Mar 31 20:48:36 UTC 2011
2011/3/31 Jean-Philippe Thierry <jphthierry.perso at gmail.com>:
> 2011/3/24 Volker Behr <behr at physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 17:54 +0100, Jean-Philippe Thierry wrote:
>> > Le 24 mars 2011 15:44, Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine at iki.fi>
>> > a écrit :
>> > 2011/3/24 Volker Behr <behr at physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>:
>> > > The log-file you sent me contains the following line:
>> > >
>> > > Thu Mar 24 11:05:53 2011 [DEBUG] file already pdf, simply
>> > copying it
>> > >
>> > (cp /var/spool/cups-pdf/SPOOL/cups2pdf-12256
>> > /home/jpht/tmp/PDF/Bugs_in_package_cups-pdf_--_Debian_Bug_report_logs.pdf)
>> > >
>> > > This option to directly copy PDF instead of reprocessing it
>> > was
>> > > suggested to me some time back and I decided not to
>> > implement it since
>> > > it would disable all options set in cups-pdf.conf on the
>> > respective
>> > > files. This is exactly what happens to you here: the PDF is
>> > just passed
>> > > through instead of getting re-worked with all your desired
>> > options by
>> > > CUPS-PDF.
>> > >
>> > > So, speaking for upstream: no fix needed.
>> > > My advise to the distribution: remove this additional patch
>> > on CUPS-PDF
>> > > since it breaks basic functionality.
>> >
>> >
>> > The patch in question was removed in 2.5.1-1 as far as Debian
>> > and
>> > Ubuntu are concerned:
>> >
>> > * Dropped 70_cups-pdf_support-pdf-workflow.patch
>> > + This patch has received more criticism than praises from
>> > the end-users,
>> > because it essentially renders the Ghostscript options in
>> > cups-pdf.conf
>> > useless, plus it no longer applies cleanly to the
>> > upstream code.
>> >
>> > From this perspective, I'd mark the issue as fixed since that
>> > version. Agreed?
>> >
>> > Martin-Éric
>> >
>> > just tried installing cups-pdf from sid on my squeeze. GSCall and
>> > PDFVer are taken into acount but... I am only getting 1 page empty
>> > documents; even failling back to the default settings
>> > in /etc/cups/cups-pdf.conf. Could it be due to a dependency issue even
>> > if not raised by the package?
>> >
>> > log file attached
>> >
>> Just as a note:
>>
>> might be related to issue #617468
>>
>>
>>
> I end up recompiling the package from source (squeeze version) removing
> patch 70_cups-pdf_support-pdf-
> workflow.patch and it works.
>
> Thanks folks for your help.
Right, because this was the patch that resulted in Ghostscript options
being ignored. I'm just wondering why you get different results with
2.5.1-1 that with a 2.5.0 with that patch removed.
Martin-Éric
More information about the Pkg-cups-devel
mailing list